🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The final authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable debates in additional EU countries