🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.